Wednesday, August 19, 2009

Sean Hannity - Obama & Friends History of Radicalisam

Friends,

This past Sunday evening Sean Hannity was to have a special on Obama's past on Fox News Network. For some 'unknown' reason this show was cancelled. It was well done and the factual information well presented in a highly truthful format. Below are six different segment links on YouTube which is the entire show which was posted there. I implore all of you to watch these six segments, less than an hour of your time.

My organization, the Organization of Conservative Americans, is now going to add another direction to our work. We are embarking on exposing Obama as a non U.S. citizen, who legally should not be President of the U.S. This may well be a monumental task, but with the support of all of you and conservatives throughout this great nation we believe that we can accomplish this prior to the DNC National Convention in 2012. If anyone has information, links, etc. on who Obama truely is, please forward that info to our Director of Media Relations at the following email address; info@OCAmericans.org, or email me directly.

Please watch the YouTube links below:Here are the 6 segments if they haven't been removed before you get to them.








Thank you all for your help in saving this great nation from this insipient socialism and we will need to continue the good fight until this radical and his administration are voted out of office.

James Koerner, Director & CEO
Organization of Conservative Americans

Tuesday, August 18, 2009

SAVE FREE RADIO !

Tired of the negative press they’ve received from suing college kids and grandmothers, the major record companies have now turned their sights on your local radio stations. The foreign owned record companies are spending millions of dollars lobbying Congress to pass a bill that would establish a “performance tax” - forcing local radio to pay for the music that is currently provided to you, the listener, free of charge.

Like all businesses, radio stations across the country are struggling to stay afloat - over 250 stations have been forced off the air in the last year alone. If passed, this bill would guarantee many more stations would fail, and those that survive would not be the stations you recognize today. It is you, the listener that will feel true impact of this tax most as it would ensure a decline in the diversity and quality of programming you expect and deserve from free radio. Click here to learn more.
Free radio needs your help in opposing the major record companies’ money grab!

You can help stop the major record companies, and keep government bureaucrats from deciding the price of the music you enjoy by signing onto our petition. This petition will be delivered to your representatives in Washington.

You can contact your Senators and Representatives directly by calling the Capitol switchboard at (202) 224-3121. To find out who your Senators and Representatives are, click here. Call your Members of Congress today, and tell them to oppose the performance tax, by co-sponsoring the “Supporting Local Radio Freedom Act”.

Together, we can ensure that free radio continues to serve your local market with the highest quality service and programming.
Thank you for your support!

saveyourradio.org

Tuesday, August 11, 2009






By Ada M. Fisher, MD


The Health Reform bills being debated before Congress is largely about who pays the bill and mistakenly equates access with insurance. Even those with good insurance know if you call for an appointment you may have to wait weeks to be seen so why do folks think adding more to the waiting list is somehow going to insure access?
The debate really isn’t about nationalized health care for in many respects we have some forms of it with Medicaid, Medicare and Veterans Affairs Health Care. What Congress is proposing no matter what folks are being told is socialized medicine in a larger sense. Those nations which have some form of it such as Russia, Canada or Cuba still have a separate accommodation for those with money. When their systems don’t work, ask large distinguished teaching hospitals in the USA about the number of foreigners who come for specialized care including organ transplants while citizens, who paid the taxes which largely fund these facilities, are pushed to the back of the line.
Health care shouldn’t be paid for by burdening those who played by the rules and became economically successful as we are demanding of the rich. Why would anyone want to make money or become successful in this country if they are going to have to pay for everything for everyone else when in simply being mediocre they could get it for free?
I’d like to see the legislators who are lawyers require of their legal colleagues the delivery of free services as we now are requiring from the health professions. While at it, please allow legal assistants to practice law without the case load or malpractice liability physicians face. And finally ask that lawyers stand by and willingly allow their profession to become nationalized with a universal payer and fixed fees of say $50 per hour regardless of the time put into a case. That is what is being asked of health professionals who often owe hundreds of thousands of dollars for student loans and malpractice cost which aren’t being relieved or reimburse by a nationalized system though we are asking them to bear responsibility as our last gatekeepers of quality care.
Americans needs to get real and wake up!?! Increasing the nationalization of health care threatens the elimination of personal and medical privacy as well as disruptions to quality care. This health care reform legislation is a boon for the insurance industries, a guarantee of payments to pharmaceutical companies, an economic killer to physicians in private practice who are wont to complain publicly for fear of being considered money grubbers and devoid of any patient responsibility for compliance in both cost co-pays based on a sliding scale as well as following recommendations to continue receiving treatments.
Michael Moore, asked the wrong questions in his expose of medicine while in Cuba for he didn’t ask what innovations to improve the lives of its citizens it had made, what programs for the disabled and their compensation was available, what research into genetic diseases and conditions which are rare they are doing, and all of those other things we do better than any other nation. If you don’t believe me, examine the roster of the Nobel prizes in science and medicine. This nation has been going for the gold in these fields and unfortunately lagging behind in most others as our children become entranced with style over substance in their choices for career options.
The HMOs—Health Maintenance Organizations have experience which shows that trying to control cost has not always worked as planned. The Romney Massachusetts Health Care Coverage for all citizens met the first criteria of coverage but now threatens to bankrupt that state with its strangling cost. While the big elephants in the room worker’s compensation, mental illness, elderly assisted living, retiree care, Medicare and Medicaid health payments and other burgeoning needs which will overwhelm the system aren’t even being addressed. Doctors, Nurses and other Health Providers must have the say in their relationship with their patients not third party payers, the government or hospital plan administrators. The Public Health System should be shored up as the entry level to care since each of this nation’s 3,145 counties have one and this simple move will not only allow access while putting the focus on preventative care.
Before attempts at muzzling its facts were undertaken, even the Congressional Budget Office noted the Health Reform Act will insure neither access nor affordability, just long lines with delays and diluted offerings. America Wake Up! Don’t let Congress further socialize medicine thereby giving us its proposed poor substitutes which negatively impact your choices.
[DrAdaMFisher.org has some innovative changes listed which will better serve all Americans. Go to it and insist that.]
DR. ADA M. FISHER IS A PHYSICIAN, LICENSED TEACHER FOR SECONDARY EDUCATION IN MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE, PREVIOUSLY ELECTED SCHOOL BOARD MEMBER, AND THE NC REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEEWMAN. CONTACT HER AT P. O. BOX 777; SALISBURY, NC 28145; TELEPHONE (704)223-2321; DRFISHER@DRADAMFISHER.ORG

Thursday, August 6, 2009

By Any Other Name

By John Hood
Carolina Journal Online


August 6, 2009RALEIGH – As lawmakers, reporters, and political observers assess the winners and losers in the long-awaited 2009-11 state budget deal, I will advise my readers not to pay attention. At the moment, it is a waste of your time.

You see, the spending numbers bandied about during the House and Senate floor debates, and even the ones contained in the official budget documents, are incomplete and misleading. They don’t include a breakout of the $1.3 billion in new federal bailout funds that North Carolina will use to paper over its budget deficit. That’s money that will be spent, on programs ranging from Medicaid to the public schools, but is not reflected in the spending totals you’re reading about. ...

There is probably going to be some real year-to-year cut in HHS spending. But in other cases, such as the University of North Carolina, it doesn’t seem likely that there will be any reduction at all once federal funds are properly accounted for. Let me try to explain what happened as simply as I can.

In summer 2008, not foreseeing the coming economic recession, legislators and the Easley administration adopted a $21.4 billion spending plan. Shortly afterward, it became obvious that revenues weren’t going to meet projections, so the Easley administration began cutting back.By the time Gov. Perdue took office, the fiscal situation had worsened considerably.

If one simply took the now-outdated $21.4 billion spending plan and adjusted it for expanded growth in program caseloads, the resulting “continuation budget” for FY 2009-10 would have been $22.1 billion. That’s the figure some are citing as the baseline from which the new budget was written, which is how they come up with gargantuan estimates of fiscal deficits and budget cuts. It is, however, entirely fictional.

The true spending total for FY 2008-09 was about $20.3 billion, a 5 percent cut from the authorized budget. Obviously, North Carolina survived it.Now move ahead to the 2009-10 fiscal year. Budget officials projected that preexisting state taxes and fees would bring in approximately $17.6 billion.

As I said, another $1.3 billion was available in new federal funds, yielding total revenue just shy of $19 billion.Here’s how the legislature and governor responded in the new budget deal. They approved $1 billion in higher tax rates, raised $56 million in fees, swiped $83 million in local revenues, transferred $98 million from other state accounts, and assumed that increased tax-code enforcement would squeeze another $210 million from taxpayers. These actions added $1.4 billion in revenue, all immediately spent.The net result?

The true General Fund spending total this year will be just over $20.3 billion – slightly above the true spending total for 2008-09.So when you see big headlines and hear scary news broadcasts about the General Assembly’s massive new round of budget cuts, just ignore them. They are meaningless. ...

The 2009 budget process was anything but transparent. As written, the 2009-10 budget is flat-out opaque. Its creators hope you won’t be able to see through it, or through them. Prove them wrong.

Click here to read the full article from the Carolina Journal Online: http://www.carolinajournal.com/jhdailyjournal/display_jhdailyjournal.html?id=5563